Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K9GNV
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 489
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5074
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 MSATA 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T042
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 340
Mixed 27.8
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 1.2
42% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 82.9
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 0.6
59% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 78%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
225GB free
Firmware: M3CR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 452
Mixed 424
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 48.5
157% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 290
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 119%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: SDM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,754
Write 61
Mixed 92.8
934% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 638
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 4.1
27,038% 214 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451U6MFR8C-C9 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback