Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 02:08
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 463 62% 461 Pts	64-Core 461 29% 461 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2332 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Lighting 74.9 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 71.6 61% 74.7 fps	MRender 75.3 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 68.6 58% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 145 86 47 61 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 425 Write 394 Mixed 307 SusWrite 120 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 3.3 95% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 182 166% 254 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 520GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 146 148 147 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 143 Write 136 Mixed 80 SusWrite 146 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB 4,218 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 9R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	50%	34	292	222	165	23.8"	1920 1080	ACR0850 KG242Y P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	393x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	384x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	354x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	401x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	349x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	116x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16