Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0329

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0329 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA750
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200917
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 716 74% 595 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q) 3,436 User benchmarks, average bench 93% Device(1A58 3002) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.7% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 145 Parallax 132 100% 133 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 118 Splatting 110 97% 120 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB 9,396 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 1424 1464 1433 1408 1414 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,032 Write 1,936 Mixed 1,508 SusWrite 1,436 388% 1,728 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 52.9 214% 74.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,178 DQ Write 980 DQ Mixed 1,074 806% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.5% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.3 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 26.5 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	17.2"	1280 720	AUOA988

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0329 Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0329

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	429x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	240x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	116x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	68x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	57x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	52x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	40x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	188x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	41x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16