Viglen DQ67SW

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Viglen DQ67SW (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67SW
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 12:12
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 346 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.2% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 162 Parallax 108 89% 127 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 96.6 Splatting 90.3 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 361 424 415 416 431 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 390 Mixed 382 SusWrite 378 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 37.5 116% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 289 237% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 931GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 125 123 125 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 105 Mixed 104 SusWrite 122 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 4x8GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 40: 3R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
40%	23%	70	288	228	60	20"	1600 900	HWP291A Compaq Q2022

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ67SW

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	145x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	108x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	48x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	107x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 46%, 11 samples	9x
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	8x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16