| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170704 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 30 '21 at 07:33 |
| Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.2%
Good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
44% 323 Pts
|
21% 345 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
31% 38.4 fps
|
28% 34.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba HDWU120 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MZ4OACK0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 16 32 63 82 92 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
27% 37.1 MB/s
|
54% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
66.8%
Good
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
50% 80.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 5% | 19 | 102 | 8 | 60 | 19.5" | 1600 900 | SAM0A19 S20C300 |
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,987 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $90Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 417x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 241x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $76Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 220x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 284x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 220x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 195x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |