Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 23:27
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 277
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 919
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1095
68% 1095 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 129
Parallax 77.4
71% 97.9 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 88.1
81% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 150 152 153 172 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,063
Write 105
Mixed 301
SusWrite 155
88% 406 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.5
177% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 241
205% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 121%
Great: 164%
Samsung MZ7PD120HAFV-000DA 120GB
21GB free
Firmware: DXM05I1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 301 307 308 310 222 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 332
Mixed 285
SusWrite 273
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 45
152% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 148
156% 260 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 93%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB
57GB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 85 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 93.3
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 83.9
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
9GB free
Firmware: HPH3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 147
Write 151
Mixed 72.2
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
120GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 147 146 144 147 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 95.9
Mixed 71
SusWrite 142
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
120GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 73 75 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 62.5
Write 71.9
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 74.2
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
271GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 116 114 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 112
Write 81.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 115
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 0B6B AHD19S8G26S 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 7R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 13% 55 337 282 165 32" 2172 1222 SPT0CC1 Sceptre C32
Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback