Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results


Gaming 194% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 237% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	52.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 22:48
Run Duration	380 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Memory 81.1 1-Core 164 2-Core 316 100% 187 Pts	4-Core 613 8-Core 1,219 108% 916 Pts	64-Core 2,682 166% 2,682 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	202% Outstanding	Lighting 296 Reflection 286 Parallax 329 241% 304 fps	MRender 341 Gravity 248 Splatting 181 201% 257 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SMI 2263XT 1TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0318B0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 1022 889 827 123 983 330 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,441 Write 621 Mixed 128 SusWrite 696 158% 722 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 14.5 120% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 70.5 126% 264 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 319%
NT-1TB 1TB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 263GB free Firmware: T180 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 110 95 86 66 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 412 Write 305 Mixed 350 SusWrite 100 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 23.6 70% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 94.9 76% 107 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 111%
Amd-raid Array 4 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 638GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 170 177 177 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 183 Write 372 Mixed 261 SusWrite 174 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 8.3 39% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 43.8 DQ Write 86.7 DQ Mixed 48.8 42% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 79%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 1,574 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 162 167 167 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 167 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 164 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.3 141% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 212%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 320GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 80 79 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 71.6 Write 68.1 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 77.5 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 79%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 282GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 40 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 20.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 40 42% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x16GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 33.1 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 33 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 162%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 10R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
56%	40%	30	314	240	144	34"	2752 1152	XMI3444 Mi Monitor

History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 25: 3R 1G 7B | Score 25: 1R 4G 8B | Score 56: 10R 2G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	783x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	537x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	420x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	353x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	282x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	243x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	148x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	128x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	113x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	150x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	115x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $840

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16