Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 14:33
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 55.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 234 72% 136 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 825 78% 648 Pts	64-Core 1,299 80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 139 Parallax 129 103% 132 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 133 Splatting 116 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 32 34 34 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 628GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 303 300 331 318 309 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79 26,606 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 6GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 99 93 99 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 55.8 Write 95.6 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 97.9 52% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.4 172% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 976GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 167 169 166 169 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 121 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 166 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 844GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 152 153 152 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 144 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 151 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion SW 6TB 325 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 5TB free Firmware: 1801 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 158 171 170 168 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 136 Write 145 Mixed 116 SusWrite 163 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.9 486% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C DDR4 4x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.8% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 23.3 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	3%	64	109	6	30	26.9"	2560 1440	BNQ801E BenQ LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)