Dell PowerEdge 2900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge 2900
MotherboardDell PowerEdge 2900  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 11:49
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5440
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 80.7
40% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 317
28% 239 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 29 24 23 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 184
Write 31.5
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 26.5
16% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.5
42% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 134%
Dell PERC 6/i 199GB
88GB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 54 47 44 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
Read 56
Write 10
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 50.9
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
186GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 55 45 44 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 51.7
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HYMP151F72CP4N3-Y5 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 12 7 0 0" 1440 900
Typical PowerEdge 2900 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge 2900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback