MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 04:14
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 296
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 968
95% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3605 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 181
Parallax 196
151% 188 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 160
Splatting 135
130% 162 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FCCT240M500SSD1 240GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 199 190 186 197 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 352
Write 277
Mixed 276
SusWrite 197
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 35.3
130% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 149
128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 90%
CT2000P1SSD8 2TB
376GB free
Firmware: P3CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1736 1734 1729 1724 285 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 1,230
335% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 94.7
328% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 360
467% 834 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 291%
Great: 321%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
328GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 94 97 98 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 52.8
Write 55.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 94.3
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
387GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 84 86 77 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 61
Write 5.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 82.1
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 68%
Samsung SSD 870 QVO 2TB
2TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 244 244 243 244 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
175% Outstanding
Read 254
Write 245
Mixed 237
SusWrite 244
334% 245 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 23.3
1,759% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 26.6
DQ Mixed 23.9
1,799% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 175%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 36.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 120 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback