Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140711
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 01:24
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 127 49% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 203 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Lighting 43.3 Reflection 42.1 Parallax 40.1 35% 41.8 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 28.2 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC500R480G 480GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: SCEK SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 385 376 330 394 326 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.5% Excellent	Read 354 Write 414 Mixed 324 SusWrite 362 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 33.5 115% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 167 131% 181 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 101%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 84 87 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 88.1 Write 90.2 Mixed 70 SusWrite 86 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17"	1280 720	GSM4495 L1734

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
R5MP120G8 120GBBench 141%, 259 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 790 samples	4x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369