Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
77% 146 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 987
88% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,841
114% 1,841 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 264
Parallax 290
229% 278 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 238
Splatting 175
194% 247 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 194%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000L7 1TB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L7QCXY7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 266 240 231 224 223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1880
Write 1,228
Mixed 901
SusWrite 324
240% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.3
213% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 389
343% 530 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 188%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 428 426 436 441 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 453
Mixed 404
SusWrite 424
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 45
148% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 290
238% 341 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
593GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 439 359 264 281 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 107
Write 478
Mixed 374
SusWrite 333
74% 323 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 36.5
132% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 294
209% 261 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 101%
Sm951 NVMe SAMSUNG 256GB
98GB free
Firmware: BXW74D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 1213 1199 1073 591 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,215
Mixed 860
SusWrite 960
255% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 56.5
206% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 571
477% 713 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 218%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
802GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 48.9
Write 87
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 97.9
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 138 134 133 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 73.7
Write 112
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 135
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 38.2" 1280 720 GSM7735 38GL950G
Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $932
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback