Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 122 50% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 2 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 131 125 134 129 127 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40% Average	Read 223 Write 144 Mixed 173 SusWrite 130 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 15.9 54% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 17.2 47% 101 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ACR256X64D3S1333C9 ACR128X64D3S1333C9 3GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 9.1 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	212x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	148x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	127x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	47x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	38x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	30x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $195