Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '21 at 19:09
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 290 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 937 89% 738 Pts	64-Core 1,480 92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% XFX(1682 5710) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22017.1004 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 116 Reflection 126 Parallax 183 95% 142 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 115 Splatting 84.3 80% 99.5 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
T-force TM8FP800 2TB 756GB free (System drive) Firmware: V900 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 202 188 219 199 201 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Amd-raid Array 4 2TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 9.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 197 164 212 201 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 132 Write 141 Mixed 100 SusWrite 193 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.4 588% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 30.5 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 30.3 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2401 24G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,675x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,442x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,257x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,475x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,850x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	648x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16