Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 17:02
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 181 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 519 53% 428 Pts	64-Core 1,230 76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.59 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.17% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.6 6% 9.67 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 9.6 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB 2,606 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 145 144 152 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 442 Write 153 Mixed 182 SusWrite 147 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 23.7 99% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 182 156% 237 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 109 110 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 116 Write 92.2 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 109 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA451R7AFR8N-TF H... 64GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 29.1 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	24.1"	1280 720	FUS0813 B24W-6 LED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	2x

RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	7x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	3x
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 24GBUnknownBench 54%, 9 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16