| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte A320M-HD2 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '21 at 14:30 |
| Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.8%
Average
|
43% 78.1 Pts
|
50% 434 Pts
|
36% 587 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
99% 139 fps
|
104% 132 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 115 117 111 110 108 MB/s
|
86.8%
Excellent
|
53% 241 MB/s
|
157% 59.4 MB/s
|
142% 227 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
426GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 141 144 144 143 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
97% 133 MB/s
|
113% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.3%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.2 GB/s
|
24% 168 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 41: 5R 2G 10B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41% | 20% | 86 | 156 | 44 | 144 | 24" | 1920 1080 | BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD |
Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 197 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 36x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 23x |
| Ryzen 3 1300XAMD $102Bench 65%, 38,959 samples | 21x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 18x |
| RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $232 |