PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20201019 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '21 at 11:23 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | NZL-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
58%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 432 437 423 418 412 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CRC 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24% | 7% | 118 | 235 | 54 | 60 | 0" | 1366 768 | MST0030 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,246x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 961x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 412x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 419x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 386x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 290x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $76 |