Asus G751JT

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G751JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JT
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 194 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 472 47% 385 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 43 Parallax 38.1 32% 40.1 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 41 Splatting 35.3 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S128G1002 128GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3310002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 176 166 175 168 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 441 Write 284 Mixed 211 SusWrite 175 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 30.6 106% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 203 169% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 833GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 99 94 92 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 111 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 93.5 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	33%	3	112	8	75	17.3"	1920 1080	LGD046C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	372x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	210x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	469x
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples	165x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	1x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	60x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	17x

RAM
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	122x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	106x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16