Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 19:41
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 260
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,144
107% 889 Pts
64-Core 2,186
135% 2,186 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4039) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 299
Reflection 286
Parallax 311
244% 299 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 250
Splatting 183
200% 254 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 204%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2856 1138 955 962 952 954 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,949
Write 2,995
Mixed 2,575
SusWrite 1,303
551% 2,455 MB/s
4K Read 75.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 106
346% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,200
910% 1,227 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 361%
Great: 442%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 418 417 420 417 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 409
Mixed 373
SusWrite 412
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 44.2
144% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 196
151% 207 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
234GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 414 413 418 414 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 399
Mixed 404
SusWrite 408
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 46.6
147% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 199
154% 212 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
168GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,141
Write 5,767
Mixed 7,088
1,694% 7,665 MB/s
4K Read 705
4K Write 466
4K Mixed 508
1,966% 560 MB/s
DQ Read 1,767
DQ Write 1309
DQ Mixed 1,401
1,084% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 112 112 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 157
Mixed 64
SusWrite 111
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
276% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 60.4
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 31.7
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 33.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,756
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback