Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics234% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 00:36
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$260
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 201
2-Core 379
120% 225 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,329
125% 1,040 Pts
64-Core 1,858
115% 1,858 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 298
Parallax 348
293% 335 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 270
Splatting 189
216% 276 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 234%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$105
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 878 986 984 1001 976 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 3,080
Write 2,932
Mixed 2,704
SusWrite 1,113
551% 2,457 MB/s
4K Read 85.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 88.8
291% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,572
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 357
395% 709 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 321%
Great: 429%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 888 824 814 823 807 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,779
SusWrite 1049
402% 1,803 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 70.6
243% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 345
401% 736 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 283%
Great: 346%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
743GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1305 1291 1319 1290 1280 1316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,533
Write 1,291
Mixed 1008
SusWrite 1,300
288% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 59.8
208% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 336
265% 380 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 223%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C17-16GTRSB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 45.5
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 38.3
112% 39.1 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 136%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0E16 C27HG7x
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 11,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback