Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E210MA
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 42.8 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 118 40% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 118 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1132) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.2 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GB 724 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV70K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 518 371 144 183 185 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 698 Write 550 Mixed 560 SusWrite 314 119% 530 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 45.9 156% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 249 188% 253 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 162%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	11.6"	1280 720	AUO235C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	16x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	16x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 724 samples	2x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	15x
Lx` 1x4GBUnknownBench 16%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $43

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16