Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 658
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 32.7
26% 32.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 21.2
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 245
Mixed 138
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 13
68% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 128
109% 160 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
566GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 98 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 116
Write 94.2
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 98.2
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback