Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '17 at 21:02
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 583
63% 502 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 21.1
8% 15.1 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 15.3
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 253GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 427
Mixed 469
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 68.5
110% 210 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
833GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 149
Mixed 158
115% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.23
81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback