Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 581
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27
Parallax 31.5
18% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 25
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MGTEC 240GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 139 30 51 41 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 240
Write 216
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 81.3
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 1.2
37% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 9.8
17% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
359GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 78.7
Write 78.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 74.9
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 43%
Jmicron Corp. 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: 8201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 41 32 50 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 55
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 36.6
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0622 DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 9% 33 177 124 60 34.1" 2560 1080 GSM7714 LG HDR WFHD
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 11: 1R 2G 0B
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback