bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DG31PR
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090421
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 05:01
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5200
J3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 29.5
32% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 30.5
8-Core 25
4% 27.8 Pts
64-Core 26.3
2% 26.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 10 9.6 8.2 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 13.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 13.1
9% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.1 3.9 4.1 4.7 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4
8% 8.02 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback