Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 1,159
97% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,159
72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 145
Parallax 137
121% 144 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 126
Splatting 112
111% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 374 405 404 407 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 425
Mixed 304
SusWrite 372
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 38.3
128% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 269
196% 263 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G266681 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 22.9
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix AG32CQ
Typical TUF B360-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback