O.e.m BIBD-ICP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardO.e.m BIBD-ICP  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 45.5
30% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 87.8
8-Core 87.5
12% 87.7 Pts
64-Core 86.6
5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B7E660 500GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 97 103 95 95 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 93.4
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 0" 1028 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback