HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 76.6
43% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 81.1
8% 66.2 Pts
64-Core 95.9
6% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 1850) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 52 68 56 67 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 70
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 60.5
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 43748 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 7.7
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback