Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 04:55
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G6950-$38
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 208
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Asus(1043 8383) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 124 281 141 28 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
135GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 93.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 65.3
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 69%
Maxtor 4D040H2 41GB
38GB free
Firmware: DAH017K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 34.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 34.4
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
425GB free
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 71 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 71.4
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 69
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 14.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback