| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 8.32% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| System | QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150206 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 21 '21 at 03:20 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
56.5%
Above average
|
55% 101 Pts
|
60% 506 Pts
|
95% 1,540 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
30% 38.7 fps
|
28% 34.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 33 18 15 35 MB/s
|
8.32%
Terrible
|
12% 56.4 MB/s
|
3% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66%
Good
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
24% 166 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 6 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | AOC0CCD 28E850 |
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples | 42x |
| Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples | 21x |
| Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 37x |
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $485 |