Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 880
83% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 133
Parallax 124
94% 124 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 125
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 109 109 62 40 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 627
Write 348
Mixed 416
SusWrite 89.7
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 38.7
126% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 168
117% 145 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 249 233 237 221 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
156GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 111 107 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 141
Write 116
Mixed 79
SusWrite 109
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 87 91 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 62.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 88.3
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 64%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
201GB free, PID 0218
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 38 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 38.1
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 36.9
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 33.7
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 28.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 2R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 15% 20 337 274 120 23.5" 1920 1080 BNQ7F04 BenQ XL2420T
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback