MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 291
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,030
96% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 264
Parallax 304
254% 293 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 246
Splatting 178
198% 252 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 208%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 99 141 100 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,481
Write 1,439
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 218
235% 1,055 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 80.9
278% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 465
434% 661 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 193%
Great: 255%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
366GB free
Firmware: UG3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 94 138 70 32 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 450
Write 390
Mixed 317
SusWrite 105
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 18.5
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 41.6
49% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 193 212 214 219 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 187
Write 168
Mixed 135
SusWrite 199
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 191 193 190 191 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 145
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 187
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
161GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 69 67 82 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 81.8
Write 77.8
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 72.2
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-20-20 D4-3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 27.3
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 27.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $741
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback