Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 19:38
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 214
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 623
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 85
55% 75.1 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 44.9
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X600 M.2 2280 SATA 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6114012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 215 202 207 206 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 466
Write 426
Mixed 294
SusWrite 208
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 33.3
114% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 276
225% 321 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 97%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
134GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1283 953 913 317 950 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 2,031
Write 1,006
Mixed 220
SusWrite 793
222% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 39.5
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 401
284% 373 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 187%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 80 73 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 75.9
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 77.8
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
575GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 82 82 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 166
Write 149
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 82.8
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
331GB free, PID ac36
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 79 79 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 76.6
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 79.6
104% 75 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 25.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 9R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 22% 80 281 204 60 27.2" 1920 1080 HWP3038 HP 27xi
History: Score 45: 4R 6G 7B | Score 66: 9R 6G 3B
Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $733
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback