Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 185
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 354
40% 311 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 69.1
60% 73.1 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 68.5
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 66 65 113 124 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 454
Write 116
Mixed 119
SusWrite 94.1
42% 196 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 19.1
110% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 49.8
80% 161 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
57GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 140 140 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 342
Mixed 354
SusWrite 175
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.7
195% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 174
182% 300 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
549GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 115 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 146
Write 111
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 115
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 182 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 150
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 182
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
360% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 240D38G628HYKLAFR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 7R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 25% 32 338 272 30 60" 1097 617 DON0060 DENON-AVRHD
Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback