Medion Akoya P5360 E MD8881/2478

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Akoya P5360 E MD8881/2478  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 194
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 336
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX460
Elitegroup(1019 0033) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 33.8
18% 27.9 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 25.5
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 385
Mixed 269
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 40
139% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 272
221% 314 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
477GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 168 167 172 147 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 174
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 161
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
18GB free, PID 0157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 34.6
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 36.7
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.2
206% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 3R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 42% 26 199 137 60 23.8" 1920 1080 BNQ78D9 BenQ GW2470
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 25: 3R 2G 4B | Score 33: 3R 5G 3B
Typical Akoya P5360 E MD8881/2478 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5360 E MD8881/2478

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback