Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 06:37
Run Duration	330 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$294 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 83.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 293 95% 175 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 928 92% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,388 86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 123 Parallax 130 118% 133 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 120 Splatting 104 103% 130 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 533 609 616 588 488 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,582 Write 1767 Mixed 1,347 SusWrite 621 298% 1,329 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 44.5 163% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 807 DQ Write 789 DQ Mixed 807 604% 801 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 297%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 435GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 341 162 161 163 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 402 Mixed 380 SusWrite 219 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 47.3 155% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 328 246% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 116GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 408 406 333 334 337 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 414 Mixed 366 SusWrite 371 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 48 155% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 240 192% 264 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 128%
Sony MRW-E90 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 15GB free, PID 0baf Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 83.6 Write 28.5 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 20.3 45% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.4 256% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 38%
Sony MRW-E90 60GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 54GB free, PID 0bae Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 178 186 186 181 167 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 260 Write 79.4 Mixed 129 SusWrite 173 196% 160 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.4 229% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 105%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 605GB free, PID a002 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.9% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 38.6 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 38.4 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 19.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 44: 4R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	46%	39	264	184	240	27"	1920 1080	DELA147 Dell AW2720HF

History: Score 53: 7R 4G 6B | Score 44: 4R 5G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $330

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,327x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,252x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	488x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	828x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	627x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	549x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	691x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	607x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	331x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	301x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	265x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16