Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 KC

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 KC (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 03:26
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10870H 23,498 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 232 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 688 70% 564 Pts	64-Core 1,101 68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Gigabyte(1458 75CA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 30 Parallax 8.9 6% 15.2 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 7 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 847GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1524 1626 1265 1362 1357 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 1820 Write 1,802 Mixed 1,362 SusWrite 1,411 360% 1,599 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 71.6 234% 78.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,117 DQ Write 885 DQ Mixed 988 743% 997 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 488%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 362GB free Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2018 803 804 812 807 811 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 631 Write 1,963 Mixed 818 SusWrite 1,009 253% 1,105 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 54.9 184% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,215 DQ Write 977 DQ Mixed 1,118 831% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 298%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown J644GU44J1293NQ 2x31.5GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 26.9 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 25.9 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDCA029

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AERO 15 KC Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 KC

CPU
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	126x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	66x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	60x

SSD
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 512GBBench 198%, 1,803 samples	68x
ESR512GTLCG-EAC- 512GBNvmeBench 213%, 1,053 samples	6x
GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TBXPGBench 296%, 5,881 samples	6x

RAM
CT8G4SFS832A.C8FP 2x8GBCrucialBench 85%, 682 samples	58x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	20x
CT8G4SFS632A 2x8GBCrucialBench 65%, 218 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16