Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 00:30
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 77.4 2-Core 140 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 296 39% 295 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2753) CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 19.4 17% 22.6 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 17.8 17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 172 166 170 162 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 213 Write 200 Mixed 189 SusWrite 160 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 24.2 86% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 82 DQ Mixed 30.8 30% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 3.4 5.4 4.8 4.8 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 4.3 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 4.9 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.3 115% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	20%	66	175	108	60	23.5"	1920 1080	AOC2470 2470W

History: Score 36: 4R 4G 4B | Score 31: 3R 3G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $117Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $496

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16