Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 705
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Apple(106B 0161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 83.5
52% 67.8 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 67
Splatting 41.6
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AQ03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 85 89 90 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 99.3
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 89
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D535833324758344D32413234303043313620 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 26.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 20% 51 105 7 60 17.7" 2560 1440 APPAE12 iMac
Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback