Google Peppy

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGoogle Peppy  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Peppy
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2955U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 39
2-Core 77.5
38% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 76.5
8-Core 74.5
10% 75.5 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A06) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNS4151S316G 16GB
7GB free
Firmware: S9FM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 21 22 23 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 262
Write 24.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 21.8
18% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 7.6
69% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 5.2
20% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 54%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 74 87 67 92 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 91.5
Write 96.4
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 72.6
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GN-F 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 6% 36 15 4 60 11.6" 1366 768 CMN1132
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B
Typical Peppy Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Google Peppy

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback