Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4115 544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 43.3 1-Core 48 2-Core 104 37% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 172 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 0.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 85 111 108 108 111 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.5% Poor	Read 118 Write 108 Mixed 111 SusWrite 105 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 8.8 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 70.2 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 24.7 35% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	1	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0000 KD116N5-30NV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	5x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16