Fujitsu D3118-A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu D3118-A1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 60.8
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 173
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 633
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,593
99% 1,593 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 76.5
50% 65.1 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 40
43% 54.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 28 11 14 92 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41% Average
Read 422
Write 260
Mixed 145
SusWrite 67.9
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 12.8
53% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 94.8
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 41.7
44% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170DZ1- 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 34.5
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3118-A1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu D3118-A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback