Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 327
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,231
110% 927 Pts
64-Core 2,212
137% 2,212 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1893 1902 1929 1932 1940 1930 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 1,885
Mixed 1,190
SusWrite 1,921
351% 1,542 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 86.1
313% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,145
848% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 309%
Great: 307%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
102GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 114 111 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 122
Write 67.4
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 111
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
146GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 145 150 146 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 146
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 78.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 44.1
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 39.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 143%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 5% 40 19 14 60 23.1" 1920 1080 GSM5871 E2351
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback