Hp____ 363F____

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp____ 363F____  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 363F
Memory1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 11:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron M120
Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 30.3
32% 42.4 Pts
4-Core 31.1
8-Core 30.2
4% 30.7 Pts
64-Core 31.6
2% 31.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)
HP(103C 363F) 336MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK8052GSX 80GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 48 26 35 34 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 59.6
Write 57.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 36.9
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8HTF6464HDY-667D3 VS2GSDS667D2 2GB
800, 800 MHz
512, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.59% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback