Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6015 APU 163 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Memory 20.6 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 29.6 15% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 31.7 4% 32.5 Pts	64-Core 35.9 2% 35.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B56) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.6 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 306 292 315 310 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 389 Write 349 Mixed 355 SusWrite 310 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 22.7 73% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 72.3 DQ Write 64.5 DQ Mixed 71.6 53% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 1x8GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 316 13% 316 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	14	8	60	19.5"	1600 900	HWP4244 HP All-in-One

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16