Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 794
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 239
Parallax 264
216% 256 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 231
Splatting 169
184% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253E2001T 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0805A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 422 435 439 444 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 462
Write 441
Mixed 355
SusWrite 430
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 11.9
89% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 22.9
43% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 105%
NFS021SA348-6007200 480GB
131GB free
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 416 419 415 391 48 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 232
Write 117
Mixed 144
SusWrite 352
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 3.7
17% 7.07 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 98
78% 107 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 93%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 32 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 113
Write 37.3
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 24.2
67% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.2
142% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.2
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 120 27" 1280 720 ACR071C XB273K GP
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback