Thunderobot 911 Plus

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Thunderobot 911 Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	THUNDEROBOT NH75RXQ-HL
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 18:47
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 85.1 1-Core 121 2-Core 240 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 678 72% 574 Pts	64-Core 905 56% 905 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 8561) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 2.6 2% 22.8 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CL1-8D512 512GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: CT22101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1106 290 431 276 248 441 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,589 Write 1,397 Mixed 1,046 SusWrite 465 251% 1,124 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 23.3 142% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 675 DQ Write 953 DQ Mixed 442 438% 690 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 166%
Intel SSDSC2KI512G8 512GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 84GB free Firmware: LHF002D SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 188 335 197 169 147 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 425 Mixed 428 SusWrite 224 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 55.5 179% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 253 208% 296 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905712-034.A00G 2x16GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 21.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 41: 5R 2G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
41%	18%	92	224	140	60	17.3"	1920 1080	BOE084E

History: Score 34: 3R 4G 7B | Score 33: 4R 2G 7B | Score 41: 5R 2G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 911 Plus Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 79%

Battleship

System: Thunderobot 911 Plus

CPU
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples	26x
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	25x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	14x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	26x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	18x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples	17x

SSD
CL5-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 140%, 158 samples	34x
CL4-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 239%, 159 samples	27x
CL1-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 138%, 779 samples	11x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	32x
AM1P32NC8T1-BDRS 2x8GBAdataBench 91%, 50 samples	11x
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 2,622 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16