Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ 85 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 39.1 1-Core 28 2-Core 65.7 27% 44.3 Pts	4-Core 71 8-Core 53.6 9% 62.3 Pts	64-Core 74 5% 74 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 18.7 15% 18.3 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 19 Splatting 16.9 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 12 8GB SSD 58 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 53 58 44 54 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.5% Very poor	Read 134 Write 81.7 Mixed 101 SusWrite 61 21% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 8.9 25% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 8.4 DQ Mixed 11.4 8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16