Jginyue X79M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Jginyue X79M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 06:07
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 181 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 652 60% 500 Pts	64-Core 1,083 67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 40 Parallax 47.7 29% 41.1 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 27.3 26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 29%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 128GB 12,357 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 106 99 94 104 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 350 Write 120 Mixed 150 SusWrite 104 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 42.9 135% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 199 165% 242 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B1K73CM0- 4x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 3R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	30%	20	103	2	60	27"	1920 1080	AOC2757 2757

History: Score 22: 2R 3G 3B | Score 24: 3R 3G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-PLUS Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Jginyue X79M-PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	15x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	15x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x

SSD
T253A3512G 512GBTeamBench 79%, 575 samples	6x
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	6x
36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 33 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16