Medionpc MS-7713

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7713  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7713
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 86.4
39% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 200A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 12.9
12% 13.4 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 9.4
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 186 171 178 189 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 171
Write 93.1
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 177
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 9.8
38% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 12
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 100%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
26GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.8 9.8 13 7.4 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.15% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 16.1
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.4
19% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
64% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 4GB
667, 200 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7713 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7713

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback